Georgia Won’t Approve AP African American Studies
![](https://www.theedadvocate.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/AP-African-American-1-660x400.png)
The Georgia Department of Education has announced its decision to not approve the Advanced Placement (AP) African American Studies course, setting off a wave of controversy and sparking a national debate about curriculum, history, and the role of education in shaping societal understanding.
The decision, announced in late January, cited concerns over the course’s “lack of educational value” and its focus on “critical race theory,” a framework that examines the role of racism and systemic inequalities in society. Critics argue that the course promotes a biased and divisive perspective, while supporters contend it offers crucial insights into the history, culture, and ongoing struggles of Black Americans.
Arguments Against the Course:
Lack of Educational Value: Critics argue that the course lacks academic rigor and is instead filled with “woke” ideology and political agendas. They claim that the focus on “critical race theory” leads to a narrow and biased understanding of history.
Focus on Critical Race Theory: Critics express concerns that the course will instill a sense of guilt and victimhood in students and contribute to division and resentment within the classroom. They believe that the curriculum lacks a balanced and objective perspective on race and history.
Unnecessary and Divisive: Some argue that the course is unnecessary as students can learn about African American history and culture through other existing AP subjects like history, literature, and social studies. They believe the introduction of this specific course creates unnecessary division and promotes a “separate but equal” approach to education.
Arguments in Favor of the Course:
Comprehensive Understanding of History: Supporters argue that the course offers a nuanced and essential exploration of Black history and culture, filling in gaps in traditional curricula that often neglect or misrepresent the experiences of marginalized communities.
Critical Thinking Skills: The course, according to supporters, promotes critical thinking skills by encouraging students to analyze historical events from multiple perspectives and understand the complex interplay of race, power, and privilege in shaping society.
Inclusive Education: Proponents believe that the course promotes inclusivity and cultural understanding by fostering empathy and respect for diverse perspectives. They argue that a comprehensive and accurate representation of Black history is crucial for building a more just and equitable society.
The Impact:
The decision not to approve the AP African American Studies course has drawn widespread criticism from educators, scholars, and civil rights organizations. They view it as a deliberate attempt to erase Black history and silence critical voices. The decision also raises questions about the role of government in shaping educational content and the potential impact on students’ access to a diverse and inclusive curriculum.
Looking Ahead:
The debate surrounding the AP African American Studies course highlights the ongoing tensions surrounding race and history in the United States. It is a conversation that is likely to continue as educators, policymakers, and the public grapple with questions about the purpose of education, the role of critical analysis, and the importance of representing diverse voices in the classroom. The decision in Georgia underscores the need for a national dialogue about curriculum standards, historical accuracy, and the importance of ensuring that all students have access to a robust and inclusive education.